Firstly, Hello to everyone on the Forum. Just the place ive been looking for..
After over 35 years of being an aviation fan and flying RC model planes. Ive decided its high time i took the leap and do my PPL!
The big question is .. JAR PPL or NPPL?? What are the advantages of the JAR PPL.. Apart from the less stringent medical and 13 hours less min flying time of the NPPL.
Regards, Mike.
Hi Mike,
I recently completed my medical for my JAR PPL, which prior to my visit, I was concerned that I wouldn't pass.
During this medical I discussed with my AME about the NPPL and its medical requirements. I thought that the CAA medical checked everything that I would say, allowed me to fly safely anywhere and with passengers. I wouldn't have approved myself with any less examination and thought it was perfectly satisfactory. The NPPL medical requirements, put some worry into my mind when sharing the skies over Blighty. The fact that your GP just signs to say he agrees, when you say you are medically fit to drive an Heavy Goods Vehicle based on medical history. Flying puts a lot more factors on the human body than driving, and personally I wouldn't have allowed myself to continue my PPL without having a full CAA medical, just because it makes sense to me at the age of 24.
I suggest you go for the full JAR PPL - because yes the minimum hours requirement is less but as most will tell you, its very rare that pilots pass within the minimum hours anyway. NPPL limits you to flying in the UK only, where as JAR-PPL entitles you to fly in the whole of Europe.
First step - do some research and get yourself a trial flying lesson at a good local club. See if you actually enjoy flying yourself around the fluffy stuff! Then after that, speak to the club about continuing your PPL and ask about the local AME's and how to get in touch to book your medical.
All the best!
Chris.
Thats great info thanks Chris.
Just what i wanted to know. JAR its going to be then!. Will get a trail lesson booked and take it from there.
Watch this space!..
Sorry it was so "Medical" based, but when the NPPL/JAR-PPL question comes up - that's really what goes through my mind!
Everything else is all about you, your passion for aviation and determination to earn your wings. I think you will agree with me that once you are up there, its the only way to actually see Peace.
All the best and happy landings.
I don't know about the future of the JAR licence since the JAA no longer exists.. The CAA say they will continue to issue JAR licences but don't give any information on renewal. So I guess we will see in the future what they do with it.
On the subject of the NPPL, medical is cheaper and easier to obtain. Training hours will roughly be the same as the syllabus is pretty much the same and in 2012 there are talks of it being EASA apprived and therefore becoming european meaning you will be able to fly with it in other countries.. It has it's limitations at the minute though e.g you can't add extra ratings to it and you can only fly Simple SEP aircraft.
The choice is yours but personally i'd go the JAR route.
Regards
Nicky wrote: I don't know about the future of the JAR licence since the JAA no longer exists.. The CAA say they will continue to issue JAR licences but don't give any information on renewal. So I guess we will see in the future what they do with it. On the subject of the NPPL, medical is cheaper and easier to obtain. Training hours will roughly be the same as the syllabus is pretty much the same and in 2012 there are talks of it being EASA apprived and therefore becoming european meaning you will be able to fly with it in other countries.. It has it's limitations at the minute though e.g you can't add extra ratings to it and you can only fly Simple SEP aircraft. The choice is yours but personally i'd go the JAR route. Regards
It still seems strange to me that a license with less stringent safety requirements (medical) may have equal rights to the existing JAR-PPL license which people have paid huge amounts of money to maintain compared to just a UK National License. I guess thats Politics eh? You must wear a yellow jacket when you go airside at this aerodrome, but this guy over here can drive a HGV and has equal rights on his license to the AME approved pilot over here?
Oh the joys of blending with Europe... 8o)
TimmyP wrote:Personally I don't understand why there is a difference between medical requirements. Surely you are either fit to be P1 or you are not?I think from a personal responsibility point of view I would have a a CAA medical either way. If I hadn't passed it I think I would have had to wonder whether I should be flying at all....
Timmy - you literally repeated my words to the AME, word for word. I completely agree!
Hi Rog,
Thanks for your contribution to the topic!
I think for my own personal confidence I would still obtain a CAA medical even if I was going for an NPPL. Because its not just about yourself, but about your passengers and the many people below you. Its not to say that NPPL pilots are any less fit than JAR-PPL pilots, but the medical won't delve as deep into current health as the CAA one does. In my opinion everybody should attend a CAA medical for their own personal peace of mind, and if you fail that medical, find out why. I for sure would want to know why as the CAA medical checks things that are justified.
I think I just speak from a personal feeling about health really - far be it from me to speak about medical matters and granting permission to fly.
Hi Rog
Indeed - lets say that life is too short however you look at it and if you're not flying - you're not living! 8o)
Copyright © 2005 Archant Regional. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions